2aTexasFootball.com

Pigskin Prep has moved on from the 2020 season to the 2021 season so everyone has access to their premium information.
I don't agree with that as the further you advance in the playoffs the more wins teams will likely have. So I took the total number of wins and divided by the number of games played to see which teams played the most avg wins.

1. Hamlin (11-1), (86-53), 7.17
2. Stratford (7-6), (89-54), 6.85
3. Wink (10-2), (82-57), 6.83
4. Windthorst (15-1), (109-79), 6.81
5. Gruver (3-9), (81-52), 6.75
6. Clarendon (7-4), (73-54), 6.64
7. Menard (0-10), (66-47), 6.6
8. Chilton (7-5), (79-56), 6.58
9. Petrolia (7-4), (72-53), 6.55
10. Wellington (13-1), (91-71), 6.5
11. Chico (1-8), (58-48), 6.44
12. Roscoe (1-10), (70-53), 6.36
13. Muenster (10-4), (89-67), 6.36
14. Mart (14-1), (92-76), 6.13
15. Archer City (6-4), (61-49), 6.1
16. Falls City (11-3), (84-51), 6
16. Lovelady (7-5), (72-57), 6
16. Frost (1-8), (54-39), 6
19. Eldorado (6-6), (71-56), 5.92
20. Bremond (8-4), (70-58), 5.83
21. Sudan (5-6), (64-58), 5.82
21. Bovina (4-7), (64-56), 5.82
23. Pineland West Sabine (7-6), (75-57), 5.77
24. Plains (2-9), (63-55), 5.73
25. Somerville (2-6), (45-47), 5.63
25. Woodsboro (1-7), (45-32), 5.63
27. Vega (10-3), (73-75), 5.62
27. Era (1-9), (56-48), 5.6
27. Cushing (6-4), (56-60), 5.6
30. Wheeler (9-3), (67-68), 5.58
31. Cumby (2-5), (39-36), 5.57
32. Maud (3-6), (50-43), 5.56
33. Mount Enterprise (1-9), (55-49), 5.5
33. Shamrock (4-6), (55-56), 5.5
35. Tenaha (10-3), (71-80), 5.46
36. Overton (1-8), (49-48), 5.44
37. Iraan (0-8), (43-39), 5.38
38. Seagraves (3-8), (59-59), 5.36
38. Seymour (4-7), (59-58), 5.36
38. Miles (3-8), (59-58), 5.36
38. Burton (4-7), (59-54), 5.36
42. Bruni (4-3), (37-25), 5.29
43. Memphis (3-7), (52-53), 5.2
44. Ralls (7-4), (57-64), 5.18
45. Agua Dulce (1-5), (31-27), 5.17
45. Pettus (1-5), (31-27), 5.17
47. Meridian (3-6), (46-58), 5.11
47. Hubbard (5-4), (46-58), 5.11
47. Wortham (3-6), (46-48), 5.11
50. Quanah (6-5), (56-60), 5.09
51. Hico (3-9), (61-67), 5.08
52. Sunray (6-6), (60-65), 5
52. Santo (6-5), (55-61), 5
54. Smyer (8-4), (59-72), 4.92
55. McCamey (11-2), (63-75), 4.85
56. Christoval (12-2), (67-85), 4.79
57. Electra (2-7), (43-53), 4.78
58. Albany (10-2), (57-71), 4.75
58. La Pryor (3-5), (38-32), 4.75
60. Charlotte (3-4), (33-26), 4.71
61. Crosbyton (1-9), (47-54), 4.7
62. Simms Bowie (8-4), (56-63), 4.67
62. Snook (7-5), (56-67), 4.67
62. Milano (2-7), (42-48), 4.67
65. Iola (4-4), (37-47), 4.63
66. Colmesneil (5-5), (46-50), 4.6
66. Benavides (0-5), (23-17), 4.6
68. Ropesville Ropes (5-5), (45-60), 4.5
69. Yorktown (7-4), (49-51), 4.45
70. Junction (5-5), (44-66), 4.4
70. Sabine Pass (0-5), (22-26), 4.4
72. High Island (1-7), (35-42), 4.38
73. D'Hanis (8-1), (39-41), 4.33
74. New Home (5-5), (43-64), 4.3
74. Burkeville (3-7), (43-53), 4.3
76. Quinlan Boles (2-5), (30-39), 4.29
77. Granger (8-3), (47-63), 4.27
78. Ranger (0-9), (38-51), 4.22
78. Booker (2-7), (38-43), 4.22
80. Runge (6-4), (42-46), 4.2
81. Detroit (4-7), (46-51), 4.18
82. Clarksville (2-8), (40-53), 4
82. Louise (5-4), (36-42), 4
84. Deweyville (8-3), (43-57), 3.91
85. Olney (5-5), (39-62), 3.9
86. Bartlett (1-8), (35-51), 3.89
87. Evadale (4-5), (34-42), 3.78
88. Cross Plains (8-3), (41-83), 3.73
89. Rocksprings (7-3), (37-66), 3.7
90. Lockney (7-2), (30-62), 3.33
91. Munday (1-6), (23-48), 3.29
92. Hull-Daisetta (6-4), (27-58), 2.7
93. Sabinal (5-4), (23-49), 2.56

Era Hornets at #27 are the lowest in 2A-D2, Dist 7. Hico, Windthorst's Bi District opponent comes at 51.

Interesting how Muenster and AC both got a boost from playing Windthorst twice.

This is great info for offseason homework.

Have to believe that anyone that played us received a boost!! I got "yelled" at when I pointed out that Muenster "found" themselves when playing the weaker teams, 4 teams that combined for 6 wins.

Hamlin's schedule is going to be torturous with losing 99% of their production on both sides of the ball. Stamford was the only team they played in non-district that didn't win their Bi-district match-up.

Non district looks to be our crucible for our young backfield and defensive secondary. Defensively the D-Line and L-backers will be returning kids. We will have to learn to get behind that O-line and grow quickly. Our district mates were far from adequate passers so we have that going for us as we gain experience.

Piper wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 5:54 pm Defensively the D-Line and L-backers will be returning kids.

Returning kids or returning starters? There is a difference. Granted you know your team better than me but looking at stats reported on Maxpreps all that returns on defense is LB #22. He led the team in tackles. There was a freshman #19 that received some mop-up time in blowouts and at the end of some games, but he did not appear in the Muenster game. There were no juniors or other sophomores that recorded any stats of substance last year. Perhaps since Hamlin was a senior-laden team they played on JV to get reps, but then again our JV team (13 kids) defeated Hamlin 32-6 as Hamlin lost 8 fumbles while Windthorst threw 3 interceptions.

Just to make sure there were no kids misclassified on Maxpreps, looked at the roster Coach Lucas sent to our booster club for our program. 19 kids listed on the varsity roster, 14 seniors, 2 Jr, 2 Soph, and a Freshman.

Returning varsity players, returning several LB several Line. Only 2 started one all year, the other a few times. So the could be a strength on defense compared to our secondary with nobody returning. Offensively 3 starters return on line. #19 and #22 will be heavily involved on offense. Other than that no idea it’s gonna be rough going at first.