lsg13 wrote:albany has put up 60+ points last 3 weeks we are in a very weak district,sometimes we dont have enough kids for a second team this year we do, they all want to play and score,we only scored one td in 4th qtr on an interception return its good practice but sucks if you are on the other side
PunchU wrote:I want to say I read that he said the exact same thing last year....
PunchU wrote:Ok, well, 20 years ago we used to run...A LOT! That was our conditioning.
ssoriole wrote:to make it worse, when he was hired, the school board told him, "Whatever you need to get us championships, we will get for you."
Eagle 1 wrote:Sooner or later it will come back on them.
punchcat wrote:Classy guy, should have given Cisco credit for being a good club, not blame being out of shape redgardless.
punchcat wrote:catfan64, I understand your logic, but when your up 70+ pts. in 4th qtr. I would assume you got the game in hand; call off the dogs quit chunking the ball and let the backups play.
BIG C FAN wrote:Welcome aboard Refugio player!We all know that your program is good ,but show respect to your opponet!Cause not everyone has been blessed like Refugio year in and year out!And good luck on your season but remember that its not much fun when your getting beat 80 to 0 by the # 1 team in the state!
GO BIG C!
beaver gal wrote:Good move, Clint. I guess I'm going to have to go over to the 2A and see what's happening.
ComancheAlumni06 wrote:Unbelivable and uncalled for is what I call that. No reason the ball should be thrown in the entire second half. Much less in the fourth quarter. And definately should not have a starting QB in with a 60+ point lead. Had to be going for the record. No other excuse. Noone from Refugio would be upset about this of course. But at what cost is it? Now Refugio is labeled by the rest of the state as classless. I know I see it that way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest